Dialogue

After two years of discussion with the Berlin Senate Chancellery for Cultural Affairs, Haben und Brauchen (To Have and To Need) organised an internal weekend workshop in February 2014 in order to draw up a blueprint for a long-term, coordinated dialogue with the Senate. This dialogue procedure is intended to stabilise the creative potential of Berlin and support those who are simultaneously nurtured and endangered by the diversity of living spaces, cultural dynamics and large social fluctuations. We, the Haben und Brauchen activists, are convinced that better understanding will be fostered on both sides through information sharing and a continual process of debate between politics and art. This would lead to the agreement of a decision-making framework in which concrete problems of art and cultural policy can be addressed more effectively and productively than the way it has until now. During the weekend workshop, working groups for three main areas of focus where established [AG Kunstbegriff (Definitions of Art), AG Arbeit (Work) und AG Stadt Raum(City Space)] and the baselines for a working and research process lasting several months was determined during which information was to be gathered, expectations clarified and positions formulated. After months of work, Haben und Brauchen was able to produce a plan, as in a so-called “charrette” procedure, which lays out how the three themes were to be treated and how not just the cultural administration but also other important departments (such as the urban planning department) would be incorporated step by step. The plan was presented publicly in September 2014 at Z/KU (Centre for Art and Urbanistics). The culture secretary of Berlin, Tim Renner, was only able to enthuse about Stadt Raum though. For Haben und Brauchen, however, the three thematic areas are integrally linked together if a discussion is to be had about reaching another understanding of art in politics. A cherry-picking of just one sub-category was not acceptable if ultimate goal was to be achieved. The idea of a long term dialogue between art workers and the politicians of Berlin, the establishment of which was the reason the weekend workshop was organised, has failed for the time being. The present publications therefore only documents the thoughts, questions and resolution methods that were examined during the weekend workshop.

Resources

After two years of discussion with the Berlin Senate Chancellery for Cultural Affairs, Haben und Brauchen (To Have and To Need) organised an internal weekend workshop in February 2014 in order to draw up a blueprint for a long-term, coordinated dialogue with the Senate. This dialogue procedure is intended to stabilise the creative potential of Berlin and support those who are simultaneously nurtured and endangered by the diversity of living spaces, cultural dynamics and large social fluctuations. We, the Haben und Brauchen activists, are convinced that better understanding will be fostered on both sides through information sharing and a continual process of debate between politics and art. This would lead to the agreement of a decision-making framework in which concrete problems of art and cultural policy can be addressed more effectively and productively than the way it has until now. During the weekend workshop, working groups for three main areas of focus where established [AG Kunstbegriff (Definitions of Art), AG Arbeit (Work) und AG Stadt Raum(City Space)] and the baselines for a working and research process lasting several months was determined during which information was to be gathered, expectations clarified and positions formulated. After months of work, Haben und Brauchen was able to produce a plan, as in a so-called “charrette” procedure, which lays out how the three themes were to be treated and how not just the cultural administration but also other important departments (such as the urban planning department) would be incorporated step by step. The plan was presented publicly in September 2014 at Z/KU (Centre for Art and Urbanistics). The culture secretary of Berlin, Tim Renner, was only able to enthuse about Stadt Raum though. For Haben und Brauchen, however, the three thematic areas are integrally linked together if a discussion is to be had about reaching another understanding of art in politics. A cherry-picking of just one sub-category was not acceptable if ultimate goal was to be achieved. The idea of a long term dialogue between art workers and the politicians of Berlin, the establishment of which was the reason the weekend workshop was organised, has failed for the time being. The present publications therefore only documents the thoughts, questions and resolution methods that were examined during the weekend workshop.

WG Definitions of Art: On Art Terms between Autonomy and Functionalisation

By the 1990s at the latest, and not only in Germany, art has been increasingly integrated into various areas of society. That development inevitably led to a change in the (self-)image of players in the field of art. A middle-class, patriarchal approach manifested in “inspired works” shifted to societal acts, often in groups, in a variety of differing formats, and in new venues such as project spaces or clubs. That development benefitted from the special situation in Berlin after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Affordable rents and the temporary availability of empty buildings opened up a “free space,” allowing -for a short time -artists to work without financial pressure, away from the art market. At the same time, the state institutions withdrew from involvement in the areas of art and culture. Even the institutions that continued to receive public funding were subject to draconian austerity measures and increasing pressure to justify their existence. The comprehension of art began to shift from a self-determined practice to a concept of putting art into operation. The current debates in Berlin about cultural policy and the desire to understand them both theoretically and strategically, make the uncertainty of the players visible. The dichotomies that have prevailed to date are eroding and the balance of power is becoming more complex. The relationship between autonomy and functionality in the field of art needs a discursive and theoretical adjustment. In July 2014, at the invitation of Haben und Brauchen, a workshop was held at the Berlin University of the Arts with philosopher and art theorist Ruth Sonderegger. It was dedicated to exploring how the concepts autonomy on the one hand, and functionalisation (or heteronomy) on the other hand have shifted in meaning in recent years, and whether or to what extent they are still relevant now to the work of Haben und Brauchen. What follows are selected excerpts from the discussion.

Autonomous Work Group on Work

AG Arbeit (Tatjana Fell, Alice Münch, Inga Zimprich, Moira Zoitl) is glad to present the poster We Imagine A Persona. Let's rework the art field together!

WG City Space > The HBZ No.1 is out now!

The present publication documents the thoughts, questions and resolution methods that were examined under the topic Stadt Raum during the weekend workshop. The work began with a plenum which included ‘external’ inputs and presentations by Katja Diefenbach, Felix Ensslin, Kotti & Co and the Koalition der Freien Szene (Independent Scene Coalition), before continuing with the three working groups. On the evening of Friday 14th February there was a public event with artists and activists from Hamburg in the Flutgraben e.V. project space. During the workshop weekend the AG Stadt Raum received inputs from Sophie Goltz and Andrej Holm. The text by Ina Wudtke and Dieter Lesage, “The short way to the Stadtschloss. Forum and Form. The Hegelmachine”, takes up narrative from the chronology of the resistance by visual artists to the Stadtschloss (City Castle) introduced by Sophie Goltz and reflects on the current City Castle debate and the ‘Prussianising’ of the city centre of Berlin. Andrej Holm has summarised his lecture in a text on the resumption of the social housing programme in parallel to the development of the people’s rental referendum movement. Of particular interest is Holm’s explanation of the faults in the previous social housing programme and the significance of his suggestions for a draft bill for a public referendum on rental conditions in Berlin. A good example of how matters were discussed is the extract of a debate in the AG Stadt Raum working group on 15th February 2014, which refers to Katja Diefenbach’s lecture reflecting on the “Haben und Brauchen Manifesto” of 2011 from her point of view from the outside. We would like to thank all of those who took part. Haben und Brauchen, Sonja Augart, Kerstin Karge and Ina Wudtke on behalf of AG Stadt Raum, Berlin, Autumn 2015 HBZ

  • bbk berlin – berufsverband bildender künstler e.V.